|
|
| Author |
Message |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:03 Post subject: Why does hypodescent exist in U.S. perception? |
|
|
| If European genes are so strong in 50/50 mixes than why are such offsprings rarely eyeballed as looking White in the eyes of most Westerners ? Yet such offsprings get confused for being Black all of the time. Most offsprings of such unions do not have the option of passing for White because they do not have enough Euro features to be considered within the Caucasian range of phenotypes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| fsweet you have some SSA admixture, do you think your phenotype would still be eyeballed by most of society to be within European range if one of your parents was say Ugandan for example ? Or do you think most of Western society would socially eyeball you as looking like a Brotha ? in other words do you think you would still have looked the way do you do now or do you think would have had darker pigmentation and more pronounced SSA features if you had a pure or atleast overwhelmingly SSA parent ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:25 Post subject: Re: Why does hypodescent exist in U.S. perception? |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | If European genes are so strong in 50/50 mixes than why are such offsprings rarely eyeballed as looking White in the eyes of most Westerners ? Yet such offsprings get confused for being Black all of the time. Most offsprings of such unions do not have the option of passing for White because they do not have enough Euro features to be considered within the Caucasian range of phenotypes. |
"Most Westerners" is a poor choice of words. Just how swarthy and curly-haired someone must be to be labeled "Black" varies dramatically among Western cultures. It has been demonstrated many times that the very same person (a Maltese or Sicilian, say) can be seen as "trigueño" in PR, "blanco" in the Dominican Republic, and "Black" in the United States.
Similarly, precisely who is "confused for being Black" or has "the option of passing for White" is not the same throught out the Western world, nor throughout the hemisphere, nor throughout Brazil (where, I understand you are located), nor even between morning and night within the very same town in Bahia, according to replicated experiments. For more on regional variation in "racial"" perception, I suggest that you read The Perception of "Racial" Traits and its end-noted sources.
With that out of the way, what you are really asking is why people of Western culture today (including Africans and their descendants) tend to see the first-generation child of a native Norwegian and a native Nigerian as socio-ethnically more closely related to the Nigerian parent. Note that the question is about skewed perception of socio-ethnic membership, not about measurable traits, which are precisely balanced.
Last edited by fwsweet on Tue 27 May 2008 20:51; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | do you think you would have had darker pigmentation and more pronounced SSA features if you had a pure or atleast overwhelmingly SSA parent ? |
Of course. But physical traits turn out to be precisely balanced (that is what "co-dominant and additive" means). What you are really asking about is the skewed cultural perception of socio-ethnic membership in defiance of actual measurement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:51 Post subject: |
|
|
I still say physical features is the main reason why the overwhelming majority of 50/50 mixes do not have the option of passing for White. Look at Barack Obama for example, millions of people in the African American community have a phenotype that is similar to his. But how many people who are considered to socially belong to the European American community have a phenotype similar to Obama's ? Like I said in another thread, the 50/50 racially mixed Obama would have a hard time fooling most people into thinking that he is a dark Mediterranean, let alone fool them into thinking he is an Anglo Saxon. And I think that's one of the main reasons why he identifies more with his Black roots, because he can go to Harlem or the Southside of Chicago and not stick out like a sore thumb from a racial eyeballing standpoint. But you can bet your bottom dollar he would stick out like a sore thumb in say Idaho or Wyoming for example, again from a racial eyeballing standpoint.
Last edited by Bischoff on Tue 27 May 2008 20:54; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William Moderator

Joined: 30 Mar 2005 {Posts: 1057 } Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 20:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | fsweet you have some SSA admixture, do you think your phenotype would still be eyeballed by most of society to be within European range if one of your parents was say Ugandan for example ? Or do you think most of Western society would socially eyeball you as looking like a Brotha ? in other words do you think you would still have looked the way do you do now or do you think would have had darker pigmentation and more pronounced SSA features if you had a pure or atleast overwhelmingly SSA parent ? |
What about Ugandan society? If the offspring of a Norwegian-Ugandan union were to move to Uganda, do you think he/she would be eyeballed as nothing more than a Ugandan? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 21:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | he can go to Harlem or the Southside of Chicago and not stick out like a sore thumb from a racial eyeballing standpoint. But you can bet your bottom dollar he would stick out like a sore thumb in say Idaho or Wyoming for example, again from a racial eyeballing standpoint. |
Pelo fato de que VSa. continua falando "a maioria do povo" ou "tudo o mundo," quando o conteúdo das suas mensagems obviamente querem dizer "a maioria dos norteamericanos," tenho a impressão de que vocé não está realmente no Brazil. Eu agradeceria o favor de me responder na linguagem de Camões. Depois poderemos voltar ao Ingles.
Last edited by fwsweet on Tue 27 May 2008 21:16; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 21:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| William it depends, they can either be eyeballed as a native if they are one of those very dark Mulatos, or they can be eyeballed as maybe looking like a Horner or a North African for example. One thing is for sure they certainly wouldn't be eyeballed as looking like a White European that's for sure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
fsweet, Obama would not be considered socially White by most Brazilians either. Here is a picture of a Brazilian Oktoberfest in the state of Santa Catarina, which has the largest number of Germans in Brazil. If Obama married one of these German Brazilian women for example I have do doubt that it would be seen as an interracial marriage in the eyes of most Brazilians. Also if you have ever watched Brazilian soap operas, most of the actresses and actors are alot more European looking than Obama. If Obama was considered White by most Brazilians than the soap operas would be dominated by people who look like him. Also if you ever go to an upperclass gated community in Brazil, you will not see too many people who look like Obama other than the limo drivers, maids, gardeners, nannies, etc.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beauty Experienced User

Joined: 02 Jun 2007 {Posts: 100 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 21:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| I have known two people mulatto people who grew up in Africa and apparently were perceived to be white. This probably because in some parts of Africa they are not used to see mixed people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
This is a formal request for clarification of Bischoff's thesis as per rule 3.6 and its sub-rules.
1. Everywhere that Western culture culture is the norm, a person of 50-50 Afro-Euro admixture is seen as "Black."
2. Nowhere that Western culture culture is the norm, is a person of 50-50 Afro-Euro admixture seen as "White."
3. Nowhere that Western culture culture is the norm, is a person of 50-50 Afro-Euro admixture seen as biracial, mulatto, or any similar "in-between" designation.
This started as a "Why" thread. I understood it to be the "Why" of (2). But I am now confused. Please re-state your thesis clearly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Tue 27 May 2008 23:31 Post subject: |
|
|
I am stating that the overwhelming majority of 50/50 SSA/Euro mixed people in Western society do not have the option to "live life as a White person" because it goes back to the eyeballing test. The odds are very low that the offspring of say a Kenyan/German union is going to have a phenotype similar to this guy's for example.
So in countries where Western culture is the dominant culture, such offsprings for the most part are never seen as White, with the exception of a few rare cases where it looks like European physical traits dominates the person's phenotype. But for the most part these 50/50 mixes where the mixed race person has a Black parent that has either little or no European admixture, such mixes usually have a phenotype that is too alien/foreign looking to pass off as a Caucasian European. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Wed 28 May 2008 03:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | I am stating that the overwhelming majority of 50/50 SSA/Euro mixed people in Western society do not have the option to "live life as a White person" because it goes back to the eyeballing test. |
Okay. That was my original understanding. So you are asking the question, "Given that objective measurements show that such a person's obvious physical traits fall precisely between the Afro and Euro extremes, why does Western culture perceive such a person as more Afro than Euro?" Why is such a person seen as simply Black?
The answer is that Western culture does not have such a perception. Latin Americans see such a person as moreno or pardo, not Black. And, with one exception, inhabitants of former British colonies see such a one as Coloured, not Black. The exception, of course, is the United States, which has a world-unique dichotomous and endogamous color line with no in-between. It is very hard for a USAmerican who has never lived anywhere else to grasp just how strange the United States is in this regard.
Earlier, you wrote, "Obama would not be considered socially White by most Brazilians either." Actually, he might be considered White by some, especially in Salvador and Rio, due to his wealth and social status. But the important point is that he definitely would not be considered socially Black by Brazilians anywhere. He would be considered "pardo" or mixed. True, he would not "have the option to live life as a White person." But he would also not have the option to live life as a Black person.
Given that, the only valid form of the question is the one printed at the top of this page: "Why does hypodescent exist in U.S. perception?" Again, labeling a 50-50 person as Black is a phenomenon that does not exist in the perceptions of African tribes (as you erroneously implied). Not does it exist in the perceptions of all Western culture (as you also erroneously implied). It exists only in the United States, so the only valid "why" question is about the United States. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bischoff Mentor

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 {Posts: 395 }
|
Posted: Wed 28 May 2008 06:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually you are wrong fsweet that Obama would not be considered socially Black anywhere in Brazil. Especially since there are many Brazilians with a phenotype similar to his who self identify themselves as Black. And also since I have access to 2 Brazilian channels on Dish Network (Rede Globo and Rede Record) and I have seen the Brazilian media refer to Obama as Black when they were talking about the possibility of the U.S maybe electing it's first Black president.
Here is a Brazilian singer named Vanessa De Mata who proudly self identifies herself as Black and no one in the Brazilian media challenges her on it. And she is not any Blacker looking than Obama. Infact you will be surprised at how many people who belong to the Afro Brazilian political militant movement who look Mulato/Pardo rather than looking like they just got off the boat from the Portuguese African colony of Angola.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fwsweet Administrator

Joined: 26 Nov 2004 {Posts: 4584 } Location: Palm Coast, FL
|
Posted: Wed 28 May 2008 11:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bischoff wrote: | | Actually you are wrong fsweet that Obama would not be considered socially Black anywhere in Brazil. ... |
Now you are talking about an individual's avowed ethno-political self-identity. Most people everywhere are polite enough to acquiesce with somone's claimed self-identity and not challenge it. But we were talking specifically about how people classify others based solely upon appearance, not about not challenging someone's avowed ethno-political self-identity. What's more we were talking specifically about the how the public "racially" perceives those of first-generation 50-50 Afro-Euro genetic admixture.
If you want to discuss society's acceptance of self-labeling, start a thread on the subject. Here we are talking about appearance-based labeling of 50-50 individuals. Please do not attempt to change the topic of this thread again. First warning, rules 3.5 and 3.6.2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|