The Study of Racialism Forum Index
The Study of Racialism
Discussion of U.S. Racialism
Please read The Rules before posting.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch     RegisterRegister 
   Log inLog in 
'

Bleu Blood and Black Blood
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> International Stories
Author Message
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 10:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Yes, I agree that swarthiness alone can't be used for this purpose. Eyeballing (as I've said numerous times) isn't always very reliable when it comes to determining admixture, but it becomes less unreliable when more than skin tone alone is taken into account, obviously.

That study you posted on early Germans is interesting, but we can't conclude much from it, as the sample was very small, and the markers Schmidt used could not distinguish blonde from dark hair and provided no data on eye color.


Dear Friends,

As I’m struggling through Ripley’s, ‘The races of Europe,’ I cannot help feeling that its all very anecdotic, like some old farts getting together and having a nice chat about a few types they saw passing by, or could be persuaded to have their skull measured up. Although Ripley talks at length of what ‘a Jew’ looks like and he shows that in a photo line up most people choose the wrong person to be a Jew.

What is missing is the REASON for all this skulduggery. As we know Physical Anthropology was hijacked by the Nazi’s and White Supremacist to push away ‘Non White’ races. I would like to show how we are all connected and why we have racism, today. Nobody is pure anything, never was and never will be.

I make use of Physical Anthropology to study personal descriptions and analyse portrait paintings. Blackness in swarthy and coloured nations comes from admixture with black immigrants who were most likely from Africa, before they arrived in Asia or Europe. If we may believe the Bible, Jews came out of Africa, crossing The Red Sea on foot. After they spent many generations in Egypt, which so happens to be part of Africa. We do not know what they looked like when part of them moved to Egypt, as the Bible informs us. So if all this is true, their ‘swarthiness’ is most probably African. Some Jews look African, with thick prognostic lips, frizzled hair and ‘swarthy’ skin. It was mentioned to me that I’m studying Jews, namely the Surinam slave masters! That’s not a problem for me, at all, as I’m not a racist. But it would be interesting to find out, if this is true, how Jews came to be Huguenots or occupy the thrones of Europe!

I remember a cartoon on the web, which pictured the profile of a (prognostic) Classic African and a supposed Irish immigrant, who was a little less prognostic, but Black looking indeed. This cartoon showed why Irish were considered Black by their fellow British Americans. All of this feeds in the story of Africans bringing Christianity to Ireland.

So I would like to know that my new friends are not some closet racist who would feel insulted by the notion of them sharing African blood with me.

Egmond Codfried
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 10:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This is all very interesting, and I look forward to what your research uncovers. Have you already published a book about this?


Dear Friends,

Here are my titles as listed by the Koninklijke Bibliotheek (The Royal Library) in The Hague.
Number 1 and 2 are the same, and I’m puzzled why they mention the cover which I have submitted first for the Depot of The Netherlands. All these titles can be ordered as I print on demand, prices ranging from 10-25 euro, postage not included.


1. De vijand van de Neeger
Codfried, Egmond / Codfried / 2006

2. De vijand van de Neeger ; *Dl. 1*Ongeediteerde correspondentie en columns 2004-2006
Codfried, Egmond / 1e dr / Codfried / 2006 (letters)

3. Carmelita, Carmen!
Codfried, Egmond / 1e dr / Codfried / 2006 (a play)

4. Maria Susanna Du Plessis (1739-1795) : dader of slachtoffer?
Codfried, Egmond / 8e bew. dr / Codfried / 2005 (Surinam history)

5. Belle van Zuylen's vergeten oma: Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737) : een beknopte studie over zwarten en kleurlingen in Europa en Nederland door de eeuwen heen
Codfried, Egmond / 1e verb. dr / Codfried / 2005

6. Belle van Zuylen's vergeten oma: Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737) : een beknopte studie over zwarten en kleurlingen in Europa en Nederland door de eeuwen heen
Codfried, Egmond / Codfried / 2004

7. Maria Susanna Du Plessis (1739-1795) : dader of slachtoffer?
Codfried, Egmond / 4e bew. dr / Egmond Codfried / 2003

My most important work which I constantly update is number 5. This was precipitated by finding a afrocentric portrait of Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737) who’s granddaughter baroness Belle van Zuylen, Isabelle de Charriere is world famous in Holland. Here I give an account of all which was written on these matters of race and colour, and what I have found after applying this knowledge on the Dutch Historiography and portrait art.

You can read about my own methodology in identifying Black and coloured Dutch nobility. First you collect personal descriptions, and then look for matching portraits. You will establish that printmakers knew about ethnic treats and could show skin and eye colour. When you have developed a feeling for this you can strike out and identify many, many gravures of people with colour, without benefit of a personal description, yet.

Important is to understand why these people of colour are today shown as white. My works are all richly illustrated with nice big reproductions in b/w, as I wanted Black people to have a nice book about themselves. Usually one finds in history books insulting and demeaning pictures of Blacks, looking like a black spot with big, bulging eyes.

Belle van Zuylen's vergeten oma: Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737) : een beknopte studie over zwarten en kleurlingen in Europa en Nederland door de eeuwen heen / Egmond Codfried
Auteur: E.S.R. Codfried (1959-)
Jaar: 2005
Editie: 1e verb. dr
Uitgever: Den Haag : Codfried
Annotatie: Oorspr. uitg.: 2004
Met lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Engels/
Omvang: [202] p. : ill. ; 30 cm
ISBN: 90-808067-2-2
Trefwoord Depot: levensbeschrijvingen; rassenvraagstuk
Trefwoord persoon: Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737)
Belle van Zuylen (1740-1805)
Back to top
MisterLawyer
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2006
{Posts: 353 }
Location: Île-de-France

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 11:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is so much in these messages that I feel I could respond to or clairify, I really don't know where to start.

Quote:
Blackness in swarthy and coloured nations comes from admixture with black immigrants who were most likely from Africa, before they arrived in Asia or Europe.


I am not sure exactly what you mean, but if you mean what I think you mean, it is simply not supported by any evidence. Without a definition, I can only guess what is meant by "Blackness" in "swarthy nations," but dark skin in Sri Lanka, Australia, Papua, Fiji, Bangledesh, etc., is not from admixture with "black immigrants" in any conventional sense of the word. It is almost certainly a retained characteristic from the ancestors of these groups who themselfs left africa some 60 or 70 thousand years ago. Perhaps some of the "swarthiness" in the middle east and mediterranean is from recent-within the last 10,000 years or so-african admixture. But the general skin tone of the people is much more likely to be simply a conserved and somewhat modified trait from the original inhabitants of the region who themselves came from, of course, Africa.

There has of course been historical immigration into europe from the middle east and africa. Of the groups who brought agriculture to europe from the middle east-charachterized by Y haplogroups J, E3b, the former K and others, and mtDNA groups T and J, E3b almost certainly came out of Africa (many would say "sub-saharan," but IMHO the E haplogroups are probably better described as simply saharan-I am convinced this was their cradle before the saharan dessication) later than the others-10-20,000 years ago, and have continued to seep north since.

I am personally interested in DNA testing and geneology. Through my spending on this pursuit, I have found that an ancestor of mine from Dublin Ire. possed a E3b Y chromasome. What does that mean? That he, like almost all other Europeans has an (some) ancestor(s) who left Africa a little later rather that sooner.

I guess I fail to see what the intrigue is in the possibility that european nobility carry small amounts of genetic information from recent african admixture mixed in with the rest of their genetic information that comes from an earlier quest out of Africa. And I really don't think you can tell who has what from paintings, and interesting as they may be. Maybe I am just more of a scientist than a historian. Who knows.
Back to top
fwsweet
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 26 Nov 2004
{Posts: 4527 }
Location: Palm Coast, FL

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 11:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

MisterLawyer wrote:
I can only guess what is meant by "Blackness" in "swarthy nations," but dark skin in Sri Lanka, Australia, Papua, Fiji, Bangledesh, etc., is not from admixture with "black immigrants" in any conventional sense of the word.

Another way of looking at it is to recognize that what needs explanation is not the swarthiness everywhere else on the globe, but the odd, unique low pigmentation level of skin, hair, and eyes found only within 300 miles of the Baltic,
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 11:56    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:

As I’m struggling through Ripley’s, ‘The races of Europe,’ I cannot help feeling that its all very anecdotic, like some old farts getting together and having a nice chat about a few types they saw passing by, or could be persuaded to have their skull measured up. Although Ripley talks at length of what ‘a Jew’ looks like and he shows that in a photo line up most people choose the wrong person to be a Jew.

Have no interest in studies that are anachronistic and have been superseded by more modern studies that are less biased. But your methodology is no accurate than theirs.

Genetic studies by Cavalli Sforza and others show that Europe was populated by people who immigrated from Asia and Africa. Both regions had darker people. The assumption that all these people miraculously lost every one of their traits is un realistic. The changes were gradual and some populations retained more charachteristics than others. I already provided a DNA study that shows that Germanic people were darker in earlier times.

Jews definitely may have picked up genetic traits in Egypt, but considering their distance, many of those characteristics were already there. This is a reconstruction of a Jew of the early periods:

This is a reconstruction of two Egyptians of the Period:


Swarthiness and broadness of face of this level in Europe could have come from multiple sources including local ones. Admixture definitely occured, but a descriptin of swarthiness and a picture are hardly evidence of African Admixture and much less some Black one drop rule hidden aristocracy.

Quote:
So I would like to know that my new friends are not some closet racist who would feel insulted by the notion of them sharing African blood with me.

Most members on this message board have some degree of African Ancestry, so your claim is foolish. But many of us still hold ourselves to a higher standard of proof than yours.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 11:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="MisterLawyer"]There is so much in these messages that I feel I could respond to or clairify, I really don't know where to start.

Quote:
Blackness in swarthy and coloured nations comes from admixture with black immigrants who were most likely from Africa, before they arrived in Asia or Europe.


Quote:
I guess I fail to see what the intrigue is in the possibility that European nobility carry small amounts of genetic information from recent african admixture mixed in with the rest of their genetic information that comes from an earlier quest out of Africa. And I really don't think you can tell who has what from paintings, and interesting as they may be. Maybe I am just more of a scientist than a historian. Who knows.


THE END OF RACISM

The point to all this is to find an answer why there is racism today. In Holland they teach children that racism is normal, and if the White's did not oppress the Blacks, the Blacks would oppress the White's. This makes me sad.

I know there is now a lot written on this thread, but I like to clarify that in some serious, thick biographies I have found nobles and kings being described as black, brown, swarthy, chimney sweep, basane, bad compexion. So I wanted to know what business 'a tall, Black man' as Charles II Stuart ‘The Black Boy,’ had sitting with his Black Ass on the British throne. In another life I would be a police detective.

It used to be that identifiyng people as coloured or Non-White was a reason to declare them inferior and would swiftley be followed by gassing them in Nazi camps. This is not my tradition, nor is this my aim. I want the end of racism.

The fact that I do not give a toss about baseball does not mean I will prevent others from taking interest and behaving like barbarians. So let me amuse myself by printing all this wonderful portraits. I'm sure you have not seen many of them before or arranged like this. Also I say that Black people now have some interest in this former White people stuff, (whitch they pay for anyway with taxes) because they are Whites, described as 'Black,' who clutch a little sweet, Classic African on their lap.

The point to all this started when 'the one drop rule' was invented to niggerise and sell people in slavery on the basis of supposed inferiority, scientifically proven! So people as my beloved writer J.A. Rogers had to set out to Europe to prove that there was proven Black blood in European royalty and nobility, but they were no savages, ridden with disease, childlike in nature, foul smelling etc.

Today we don’t hear about these discussions as White people just assume they are superior to the rest.

Egmond Codfried


Egmond Codfried
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Salsassin"]
Egmond Codfried wrote:

As I’m struggling through Ripley’s, ‘The races of Europe,’ I cannot help feeling that its all very anecdotic, like some old farts getting together and having a nice chat about a few types they saw passing by, or could be persuaded to have their skull measured up. Although Ripley talks at length of what ‘a Jew’ looks like and he shows that in a photo line up most people choose the wrong person to be a Jew.


Quote:
[I] Have no interest in studies that are anachronistic and have been superseded by more modern studies that are less biased. But your methodology is no accurate than theirs.



Quote:
So I would like to know that my new friends are not some closet racist who would feel insulted by the notion of them sharing African blood with me.


Quote:
Most members on this message board have some degree of African Ancestry, so your claim is foolish. But many of us still hold ourselves to a higher standard of proof than yours.


Dear,

Maybe because of young age you are not aware of your hostile tone of voice. You might want to ask somebody around you if this is true, and I ask you kindly to sweeten your tone. Nobody knows everthing and by now you should know that scientist rarely agree. I have studied the same sources as some writers did and came up with a whole different story. So I express my views and practice my freedom of speech.

Lets agree to disagree, okay?

Egmond Codfried
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

DELETED

Last edited by Egmond Codfried on Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:38; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

DELETED

Last edited by Egmond Codfried on Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:39; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

JOHAN DE WITT



JOHAN DE WITT, SOMETHING LIKE A PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE NETHERLANDS. BLACK SKIN TONE?



BLACK? A MARBLE BUST IN OUR PARLIAMENT BUILDING SHOWS HIM TO LOOK LIKE AN ARAB TYPE FROM CASABLANCA. LUCIOUS THICK LIPPED, LARGE BUT NOT PORTRUDING CHIN AND A MAGNIFICENT EASTERN NOSE. THE FAMILY WAS FAMOUSLY PROTESTANT, PERHAPS ORGINATING IN SWISS.

http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/Johan_de_Witt.jpg/429px-Johan_de_Witt.jpg&imgrefurl=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Johan_de_Witt.jpg&h=599&w=429&sz=47&hl=nl&start=75&um=1&tbnid=LU6m17fPDzkybM:&tbnh=135&tbnw=97&prev=/images%3Fq%3Djohan%2Bwitt%26start%3D60%26ndsp%3D20%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dnl%26sa%3DN

HALF-WHITENED?



WHITE



THE BROTHERS DE WITT LYNCHED BY SUPPORTERS OF THE ROYAL ORANGE FAMILY



WILLIAM OF ORANGE, FOUNDER OF THE ORANGE DYNASTY, DESCRIBED AS BROWN OF COMPLEXION AND THE BEARD AND MORE BROWN THEN WHITE, LOOKING QUITE PROGNASTIC.
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 12:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
a tall, Black man' as Charles II Stuart ‘The Black Boy,’

I hope you are aware that Black and swarthy have been used interchangeably to describe anyone who is darker by comparison around the globe, in many languages. It is called a hyperbole.
The Mongols called these people Black Mongols (Khara Mongour).

Does that make them African?

When the Spaniards arrived in South America they described the Charruas as Black.



Does that make them African?

Here is a chart based on Jablonski's skin color studies.
Notice that there are populations in Greenland that are darker than populations in Turkey or Tunisia.


Let I remind you that even before Charles II's birth England had already reached India, and the Portuguese Empire was well under way. In fact, if we are going to consider Portuguese lineage, we can just as well say the ancestry that produced the swarthy skin was from India, South America, etc. As we are playing the speculation game they are all equally valid.

Skin reflectance samples from Jablonski's study from darkest to lightest.
Australia (Darwin - Aborigines) 19.3
Mozambique (Chopi) 19.45
Cameroon (Fali Tinguelin) 21.5
Namibia (Okavango Bantu, M’bukushu at Bagani, Kuangali) 22.92
Chad (Ndila Sara - Madjingay) 24.6
Namibia (Kurungkuru Kraal, Tondoro) 25.55
Tanzania (Nyatura) 25.8
Malawi (Mainly Cewa) 27
Nigeria (Yoruba) 27.4
Nigeria (Ibo) 28.2
Burkina Faso (Kurumba from Roanga) 28.6
Tanzania (Sandawe) 28.9
Zaire 29.4
Liberia (Mainz - Africans from Ghana and Liberia) 29.4
PNG (Lufa - Lufa villagers) 31
Ethiopia (Residents of Adi-Arkai (1500 m altitude), 31.7
PNG (Karker - Karker Islanders) 32
India (Orissa, Koraput Town - Bareng Paroja, Bado Gadaba) 32.05
Kenya 32.4
Namibia (Rehoboth Baster - Black Bushmen at Bagani) 32.9
Zaire (Congolese except 3 Cameroon females) 33.2
PNG (Goroka) 33.3
Ethiopia (Highland - Residents of Debarech (3000 m altitude)) 33.55
Mali (Dogon) 34.1
PNG 35.3
PNG (Mt. Hagan - Western Highlands) 35.35
Sudan 35.5
Swaziland 35.6
PNG (Port Moresby - Hanuabada) 41
India (Nagpur - Mahar) 41.3
Botswana (Kalahari - Central Bushmen, Yellow Bushmen at Lone Tree, Central San, Yellow Bushmen at Takashwani, Central San, Yellow Bushmen at Ghanzi, Central San) 42.4
South African (S. A. Negroes (73% Tswana and Xhosa), Bantu (96% Xhosa)) 42.5
Peru (Maranon - Aguarana Indians) 43
South Africa (Warmbath - Hottentot) 43.75
Libya (Fezzan) 44
India (Angami Nagas) 44.6
Average 46.18
India (Goa) 46.5
India (Southern) 46.7
South Africa (Namaqualand, Hottentot) 46.8
Brazil (Parana - Guarani) 47.2
Peru (Nunoa - Az) 47.7
Brazil (Caingang Indians) 49.4
India (Bengal - Low Caste, Kayastha, Brahman, Vaidya, Rarhi Brahman) 49.73
Nepal (Eastern - Jirel, Sunwar, Sherpa, Tamang, Brahman, Chetri) 50.42
South Africa (Cape - Cape Coloureds) 50.96
India (Rajasthan - Rajputs) 52
Pakistan 52.3
Saudi Arabia - Saudi 52.5
Jordan (Non-village Arabs, All Arabs) 53
India (Northern - Baniya, Jat Sikhs, Haryana Jats, Khatris, Brahmans, Aroras) 53.26
Russia (Chechen) 53.45
Libya (Cyrenaica) 53.5
Japan (Southwest) 53.55
Cambodia - Khmers 54
Philippines (Manila - Filipino) 54.1
China (Tibet - India Mussoorie - Tibetans) 54.17
India (Punjab, England, Dehli - Sikhs, Punjabi) 54.24
Libya (Tripoli) 54.5
Morocco 54.85
Japan (Northern) 54.9
Japan (Central) 55.42
Afghanistan/Iran 55.7
Greenland (Southern - Eskimo Ammassalimiut) 55.7
Vietnam 55.9
Tunisia 56.3
Algeria (Aures - Chaouias from Bouzina) 58.05
Israel 58.2
Lebanon 58.2
Japan (Hidakka - Ainu) 59.1
Turkey 59.15
China (Southern, Hong Knog - Han) 59.17
Iraq/Syria (Kurds) 61.12
UK (London- Europeans) 62.3
Belgium 63.14
Ireland (Carnew) 64.5
Spain (Leon - Meseta, Cabrera, Bierzo, Montana, Maragateria) 64.66
Ireland (Rossmore) 64.75
UK (Wales - Isle of Man, Merthyr Tydfil, North Pembrokeshire) 65
Ireland (Longford) 65
Ireland (Ballinlough) 65.2
Spain (Basque - Basque and non-Basques) 65.7
UK (Northern) 66.1
UK (Cumberland) 66.75
Germany (Mainz - German and American Whites) 66.9
Netherlands (Dutch (mainly resident in Utrecht)) 67.37
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 13:13    Post subject: Reply with quote



[Portrait of a Blackamoor by Jan Mostaert (1475-1556). This nameless black man, was painted during the European Renaissance, and may have been associated with the court of Margaret of Austria in Malines or Charles V. His rich clothing, the gloves, the sword and the embroidered bag suggests a Spanish-Portuguese connection. His appearance shows him of the considerable status during the period. The pilgrim’s insignia on his hat, indicates his connection to Our Lady of Halle in south Brussels. Pilgrims journeyed there to give devotion to the Black Madonna of Hal/Halle.]



ALESSANDRO DE MEDICI, HUSBAND TO MARGARETHA OF PARMA (AUSTRIA), ILLIGITEMATE DAUGHTER TO CHARLES V HABSBURG AND HALF SISTER TO FILIPS II HABSBURG



MARGARETHA OF PARMA (OR AUSTRIA), GOVERNESS OF THE NETHERLANDS


Black is beautiful


In the summer of 2008 the Nieuwe Kerk will present a journey of discovery though the history of art. For the first time the attractiveness of the black person in the art of the Low Countries will receive attention. Many great masters turn out to have portrayed black people. The fascination with them will be illustrated in about 135 paintings, drawings and manuscripts from collections here and abroad. Black is beautiful presents a remarkable oil study by Rubens, an intimate drawing and etching by Rembrandt, paintings by Jordaens, Mostaert, Breitner, Jan Sluijters, Karl Appel and Marlene Dumas, and beautifully illustrated manuscripts from the late Middle Ages such as the famous Van Maerlant manuscript.

Together these works give an idea of the changing role of black people in Dutch art and culture. They show that for seven centuries black people have been part of Dutch art and history, in which they play an ever more important role. Striking images and new insights take us from the year 1300, via the great masters of the seventeenth century, to contemporary art. Iris Kensmil has made twelve memorial paintings especially for this exhibition; they pay homage to her predecessors in black emancipation. They will be temporarily added to the architecture of the imposing Nieuwe Kerk.

The exhibition is divided into three main sections: the Old World, the New World and the Modern World. These sections are further divided into subjects such as The black king, Strong men, Strong women, Africa and the Africans, (South) America and the slaves and Portraits.

For the first time Black is Beautiful presents a broad and coherent view of the beauty of black people in seven centuries of art in the Low Countries. The exhibition, which fills a gap in the study of Dutch art, is the result of years of research by guest curator Esther Schreuder and has been realised by the Nieuwe Kerk thanks to contributions from the VSBfonds, the Mondriaan Stichting and the Amsterdams Fonds voor de Kunsten. The exhibition is accompanied by a catalogue with international contributions in a Dutch an English edition which was made possible by the Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds.

A 50-minute documentary about the exhibition will be shown on television. In October a broad programme of activities surrounding the subject of the exhibition will be organised.

===============================================

MY PROBLEM WITH THIS EXPOSITION IS THAT ONLY THE CLASSICAL AFRICAN LOOKING TYPES WILL BE INCLUDED, NOT THE MORE MULLATO TYPES AS MARIA JACOBA VAN GOOR OR CHARLOTTE SOPHIE VAN MECKLENBURG. I ALSO DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS MAN BY MOSTAERT SHOULD REMAIN ANONYMOUS.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 13:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Salsassin"]
Quote:
a tall, Black man' as Charles II Stuart ‘The Black Boy,’

I hope you are aware that Black and swarthy have been used interchangeably to describe anyone who is darker by comparison around the globe, in many languages. It is called a hyperbole.
The Mongols called these people Black Mongols (Khara Mongour).

Does that make them African?

Quote:
When the Spaniards arrived in South America they described the Charruas as Black.


http://kindness-is-kool.com/blackworldhistory.html

You are so right. I have meant to be practical and cut through all this confusion by concentrating on skin color, mostly, realising that these people I have identified as Black of skin, would today not be accepted as White in Europe.



Or imagine Lorenzo de Medici applying for the position of Grand Dragon at his local KKK Chapter. He would be dismissed, immediatly, as 'a damn n*gger.' Of course he could come up with these charts you publish to bolster the claim, but even a judge would say that he looked like a 'damn c**n.'

Check out Alessandro de Medici. I see African features. Do you concur? Perhaps you could catch your breath and try to see more of these wonderfull portraits, before you dismiss my novel approach.

Egmond Codfried


Last edited by Egmond Codfried on Fri 11 Jul 2008 14:30; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 13:41    Post subject: Reply with quote

History of The Black Boy Inn
Source: The Black Boy Inn

[url]Many portraits:
http://forum2002.maghrebonline.nl/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=17290&st=0&sk=t&sd=a[/url]

Over the years at the Black Boy Inn, there has been much debate as to how this lovely country inn came to gain its name. Built in the mid 16th Century, history leads us to believe that it may have been named after King Charles II who was born with a very dark complexion and was, during the civil war, sometimes referred to as ‘the black boy’. The following extract is taken from English Monarchs, The House of Stuart.
“Charles’ appearance was anything but English, with his sensuous curling mouth, swarthy complexion, black hair and dark eyes, he much resembled his Italian maternal grandmother, Marie de Medici’s side of the family. During his escape after the Battle of Worcester, he was referred to as ‘a tall, black man’ in the parliamentary wanted posters. One of the nick-names he acquired was ‘the black boy’.”
However there are other stories too. Reflecting the early slave trade, there is the story of the young black boy found hiding in the cellar and also that of the local village woman who purportedly gave birth rather unexpectedly to a dark coloured child. Turning to the archives, the Banbury Museum on the other hand tells us that prior to being an inn, the Black Boy may have been a tobacconist as they used to be called Black Boys around this time.
If you have any thoughts or ideas, do let us know. The same applies to our resident ghost. None of the current team has met with her yet!
VIEW: Some National Portrait Gallery portraits of King Charles II Stuart
Egmond Codfried
-------------------------------------------------
ORIGINS OF THE BLACK BOY

Charles II Stuart (1630-1685), named The Black Boy
The Stuart family plays a central role in my research on the black and coloured royalty in Europe from the Renaissance to the French Revolution: 1500-1789. I describe this period as ‘Reversed Apartheid,’ where it was a coloured and black minority which dominated white Europe. The many NPG engravings of Charles II show a royal, black skinned child and later as a black skinned man, who came from royal, black-skinned parents. How is such a thing possible and why don’t we hear about it? My research shows that Europe was dominated by a black and coloured minority elite, who considered themselves nobles. They symbolised their ethnicity by the little Moor or Black Page we find on many portraits of the nobility. This Moor is a symbol for the elusive term of Bleu Blood, and points to their ancestry and ideology. They are shown as white’s, just as Charles II is shown on many paintings, but most of them were dark of skin. This can usually be seen on engravings. Some painted portraits were later ‘whitened’ with beige paint. Some even had dark skin and classical African features as Charlotte Sophie of Mecklenburg Strelitz does on the Sir Ramsay portraits. She was the queen of George III and the grandmother to Queen Victoria. They were:“A European, intermarrying, fixed mulatto nation, with a black identity and members which looked more African or Asian or white.” I consider the French Revolution as the end of this apartheid like oppression. The coloured nobility then turned their attention to ‘breeding’ white offspring.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO WHO WAS KING CHARLES II?
http://www.englishmonarchs.co.uk/stuart_3.htm

“Charles’ appearance was anything but English, with his sensuous curling mouth, swarthy complexion, black hair and dark eyes, he much resembled his Italian maternal grandmother, Marie de Medici’s side of the family. During his escape after the Battle of Worcester, he was referred to as ‘a tall, black man’ in the parliamentary wanted posters. One of the nick-names he acquired was ‘the black boy’. His height, at six feet two, probably inherited from his Danish paternal grandmother, Anne of Denmark, also set him apart from his contemporaries in a time when the average Englishman was far smaller than today.”
Some ignorant misinformation on the internet:

[img]http://www.geocities.com/vue2sewell/CharlesII ...[/img]

“CHARLES was born in 1630 and was nicknamed the Black Boy because his mother, Queen Henrietta Maria, was ashamed of his dark and swarthy appearance.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALESSANDRO DE MEDICI

Queen Henriette Maria, Charles II mother, was the daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France, from a black noble family. She was the sister of Louis XIII and the aunt of Louis XIV, The Sunking. Many members of these families are described or shown as ‘swarthy’ and many as Alessandro the Medici, even have African facial treats. The National Portrat Gallery-site has some black engravings of a extremely black skinned queen Henriette and her black skinned husband Charles I Stuart. A grandson of black skinned Mary of Scots, who was beheaded by orders of her niece Elizabeth I Tudor.
Egmond Codfried
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A MISTRESS AND AN ILLEGITIMATE CHILD TO CHARLES II STUART

[img]http://www.kipar.org/period-galleries/paintin... [/img]
Louise de Kerouaille

[img]http://www.kipar.org/period-galleries/paintin... [/img]



[The Countess of Lichfield with a ‘Black Boy.’ ]

Louise de Kerouaille from France was a mistress of Charles II Stuart. She was from noble extraction which she symbolises by posing intimately with the symbol of Bleu Blood, a beautiful black child who offers her white pearls. There are many portraits of this kind in European art. The first thing a noble person wants to tell the world is of his or her Bleu Blood, which instantly gives power, privileges and riches to a person.
The nobility presents themselves as having Bleu Blood, which meant that they were also biologically superior. Nobility did not come with landholdings, but was something in their DNA. Because they choose a African with classical treats I conclude that they speak about their ethnic origins. The old French and Dutch nobility were descendents from the Franks, free people who conquered the Dutch Germanic tribes and the Roman Gallic peoples living in France. The Latin speaking Franks most likely descended from the Nubians and Iranians which Julius Caesar brought to Europe in 50 BC to fight the Germanic peoples, and who stayed on.

The Countess of Lichfield was considered an illegitimate daughter of Charles II Stuart and Barbara the Villiers, his maitresse-en-titre. She is shown with a different looking black who resembles her father when he was a child. This I consider a very witty use of the symbol for her Bleu Bloodedness. The face is whitened of course as no child of a swarthy father as Charles II could be so blindingly white.

Egmond Codfried
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 13:49    Post subject: Reply with quote



My neighbour asked if you have his telephone number, as she needs a date for tomorrow night. She has promised to measure his skull, when he is asleep!
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 14:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

IS THIS A GARAMANTE WARRIOR BROUGHT TO EUROPE BY CAESAR IN 50 BC? DESCRIBED AS HAVING THEIR HAIR IN A 'CREST,' SO I ASSUME DREADLOCKS. HOW CAN WE GET THIS PICTURE PINTED HERE ON ONEDROPRULE.ORG?

EGMOND CODFRIED

[url]
http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_image.aspx?image=an22735.jpg&retpage=20442[/url]


Height: 60.000 mm
P&E PRB 1856,7-1,19
Room 49: Roman Britain

Bronze figurine of a Moorish cavalrymanRoman, probably 2nd or 3rd century AD
London, England


'My initial response is to the contextualisation of the figure in Roman Britain. I would like to know more about the relative cosmopolitan make up of society at that time and the influence on the UK gene pool. Visually the figure is reminiscent of Rastafarians with its apparent dreadlocked hair and beard. I would like to see more information, perhaps an exhibition on the range and variety of hairstyles within African cultures and their meanings. That this figure was a cavalryman demonstrates there was a high level of military competence in Africa at the period which this figure represents.' Stuart Taylor, of English/Caribbean/Black British origin

This bronze figurine, originally seated on a horse, shows a Moor from the Roman province of Mauretania in North Africa. He has distinctive dreadlocks, a drooping moustache and a full beard. His eyes appear very lifelike because they are inlaid with silver. He wears leather boots and a short cloak over a tunic, and he holds his round shield in front of him. His right hand, now broken, would probably have held a spear.

Moorish cavalrymen rode without bridles and as early as the second century BC they were famous for their nimble horsemanship. They were deployed as specialist units in the Roman army, and a detachment is clearly depicted in one of the sculpted battle scenes on Trajan's Column in Rome (erected about AD 113). There they are shown fighting alongside Roman troops in the Emperor Trajan's Dacian Wars (AD 101-105).

An altar inscription tells us that one of these Moorish units, the numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum, was in Britain from the third to the fourth century AD. They were based at the fort of Aballava (Burgh-by-Sands) at the western end of Hadrian's Wall, and were probably brought over by the Emperor Septimius Severus (reigned AD 193-211), himself a North African.

K.R. Dixon and P. Southern, The Roman cavalry (London, Routledge, 1992)

A. Hyland, Equus: the horse in the Roman (London, Yale University Press, 1990)

P.A. Holder, The Roman army in Britain (London, Batsford, 1982)

A. Hyland, Training the Roman cavalry (Stroud, Glos., Sutton Publishing, 1993)
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 14:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:

My neighbour asked if you have his telephone number, as she needs a date for tomorrow night. She has promised to measure his skull, when he is asleep!

Tell your neighbor to join up post a picture and then her telephone. I am sure if she is worthwhile she can get attention from many of the young guns here.
Back to top
Salsassin
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 04 Apr 2005
{Posts: 3508 }

PostPosted: Fri 11 Jul 2008 14:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egmond Codfried wrote:

http://kindness-is-kool.com/blackworldhistory.html

Why would I pay attention to a website that mixes fact with fantasy? First off, it assumes a global Black race. Wrong.
Second, it follows foolish claims like the Olmecs being African. A waste of my time.

Quote:
You are so right. I have meant to be practical and cut through all this confusion by concentrating on skin color, mostly, realising that these people I have identified as Black of skin, would today not be accepted as White in Europe.



Or imagine Lorenzo de Medici applying for the position of Grand Dragon at his local KKK Chapter. He would be dismissed, immediatly, as 'a damn n*gger.' Of course he could come up with these charts you publish to bolster the claim, but even a judge would say that he looked like a 'damn c**n.'

Check out Alessandro de Medici. I see African features. Do you concur? Perhaps you could catch your breath and try to see more of these wonderfull portraits, before you dismiss my novel approach.

Egmond Codfried

I've been looking at your pictures and Frnakly I think you see what you want to believe, because I see faces that are ordinary European faces.
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Sat 12 Jul 2008 08:30    Post subject: Reply with quote



[img]http://www.khm.at/system2E.html?/staticE/page2392.html[/img]

http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=http://www.tuerkenbeute.de/media/il9_illuWindowGross/G1-1LeopI_00_il9_503x690.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.tuerkenbeute.de/window/illustration/G1-1LeopI00il4_02_de.php&h=690&w=503&sz=52&hl=nl&start=7&tbnid=kNoQIyI6HQS-xM:&tbnh=139&tbnw=101&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dleopold%2BI%2Bhabsburg%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Dnl%26sa%3DG


http://www.jamd.com/search?assettype=g&assetid=2661628&text=leopold+I+habsburg

EMPEROR LEOPOLD I HABSBURG (1640-1705)

[Swinburne: ‘a short, hale black man’]

[This work belongs to a series of six portrait busts of the various Habsburg monarchs living around 1695 and their male offspring. The series was commissioned by Elector Johann-Wilhelm of the Palatine-Neuburg, brother-in-law of Emperor Leopold I, in order to set up a monument to the Austrian monarchy and its dynastic connections at his Düsseldorf residence. On 27th August, 1695, Leopold I inspected this series executed by the court sculptor Strudel. He was so pleased that all the busts remained in Vienna. The august appearance, the long wig and crowning laurel wreath, as well as the skilful drapery of the bust idealize the irregularity of Leopold I’s features and make this into an impressive regal portrait.]



Deconstructing racism:
ARGUMENTS FOR A FIXED MULATTO EUROPEAN ELITE 1500-1789


Thank you for taking the time to look at part of my collection and making this comment. What I love about A.J.Rogers is his sense of humour. I nearly fell from my chair in the library, laughing about his handling of the Gustav VI Adolf/ baron of Fulkila scandal.

Snowden in ‘Black’s in Antiquity’ shows how his White colleague’s would describe a stone head as ‘White’ or a ‘Caricature’ when this clearly shows Black features. Some even were adamant that there was no trace of African treats. Snowden shows these wrongly described pieces and I see the Blackness, often overwhelmingly so.

So why is it that one can see it and another does not?

I assume that it’s a skill you pick up growing up in a mixed society like Surinam, with fifteen ethnicities and a thousand mixtures, where it’s normal to discuss personal ethnicity and having great fun doing so. I always say that in Suriname we have no need for paternity DNA tests because we have Old Women, no insult intended. They would always know who the father is, by not sleeping and looking out of the window and see who is ‘talking’ to who, by just taking one look in the crib. And woe! the woman who has strayed and produced a child which shows the most tiny sign of an admixture of Javanese, Indian or White, which does not run in the last seven generations!

A skilled doctor could sit quietly in a train and study his fellow patients and could see if they have some hidden condition. Like listening to breathing, looking at a complexion, observing ‘drumstick fingers,’ which point to diseases of the heart. So eyeballing can be very handy, when there are no other means to measure.

I have limited my research to the period 1500-1789. The start of The Renaissance when everything changed and pieces with a Moor emerged.

So as I explained, I have no recourse to DNA test or skull measurements so we will have to do with:

Personal descriptions: Black, Brown, swarthy, chimney sweep, bad complexion, ugly, of low birth: about powerful, elite European persons

Self descriptions as Black, brown, not the white hands

Black and even pitch black looking portraits of an imperial, royal, noble or intellectual elite person or his blood relatives

The existence of both white and black portraits of the same person.

The extensive use of The Moor in portraits, centrally placed in religious scene’s, precious jewellery etc

The use of the Moor, always a Classical African, in literature as in Othello, The Masque of Blackness etc

The over painting of portraits with beige paint, with pigments from a later era.

The denial of Blacks existing in Europe

The white make-up and blond wig fashion, the make up also being a bleaching cream

The violence of the French revolution to overthrow this elite


When I started my research I saw a methodology that a researcher has to prove Black ethnicity by producing a Black ancestor. What if this one Black ancestor is so far back in time that nobody knows him? I have seen a few of these eurocentric articles and immediately noticed that the central person must have married another coloured, as the off spring looked dark. Like in the case of Alexander Pushkin who must have been truly Black and classical African in looks as most of his ancestors from both sides were of colour. It’s not only Abraham Hannibal who provided the Blackness. Pushkin’s granddaughter Nadeja Mountbatten, Countess of Merenburg, Marquise of Milford Haven, daughter of a Russian Grand Duke and Pushkin’s granddaughter Sophie, married to a grandchild of Queen Victoria, still is reported to have had ‘negroïd’ hair. Seven generations after Hannibal, Pushkin’s great grandfather.

What if people who are more or less of colour marry among each other and produce ‘mulatto type’ offspring. Some of the best examples are not on the web, though, but at the Iconografische Bureau in The Hague. To be allowed to publish one needs mega bucks! This is one reason I had to formulate my ‘fixed mulatto race’ definition, to be able to move on. There are many human mixes which remain nameless, but White they ain’t!

University students are not taught to change or overthrow the status quo. I think of these bright young man and woman as the ‘Basiji’ of Iran, the religious police. They patrol the streets to see that no one tries to alter the ‘Revolution’, the status quo. They must faithfully repeat what they have been told and forcefully reject anyone who breaks with orthodoxy. Science today is being seen by some thinkers as a religion, and apostasy is punishable by death! In Holland Black scholars can only research ‘slavery’ (1500-1900) and not meddle in White People’s stuff. Like saying things, about Rembrandt or William of Orange. They can only move between the lines which were set out by their Eurocentric professors. If they fail to this they will be evicted from Academia.

My strength is being an outsider in many ways and escaping Eurocentric, and white supremacy indoctrination. That’s why I feel I have little time left to inform others about these matters. As soon as I have found a Black noble in Google, it’s removed or blocked. It used to be that the first portrait of Charles II Stuart in Google would be on of the blackest one. Now it’s lost, and can only be seen if you go into my postings.

People should take care to download all these portraits, while they can. It will only take ten minutes, to put in on a CD.

Egmond Codfried
Back to top
Egmond Codfried
Suspended
Suspended


Joined: 03 Jul 2008
{Posts: 169 }

PostPosted: Mon 14 Jul 2008 13:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

QUEEN HENRIETTA MARIA, MOTHER OF CHARLES II STUART; THE BLACK BOY



http://www.jamd.com/search?assettype=g&assetid=51243784&text=QUEEN+HENRIETTA+MARIA

She was a daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France, and Henri IV. Sister to Louis XIII and aunt to his son Louis XIV, The Sun King of France.
Her daughter Maria Henriette Stuart married William II, Stadholder of The Netherlands. Their son, King William III married his niece Maria Stuart and became king of England. The Orange marches in Ireland celebrate King William's victory over his catholic father in law, James II.
William III died childless, so his titles went to another branch of the Orange family, of the older brother of William I of Orange, Johan VI, Count of Nassau.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Study of Racialism Forum Index -> International Stories All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group