Rachel Lerman plays with her twin sons Miguel, left, and Alejandro at their home in Washington. Lerman draws puzzled looks when she's in public with her boys.
TODD LEWAN, The Associated Press
Quote:
Rachel Lerman is the embodiment of melting-pot citizenry: Born in 1967 in Boston to a blonde, blue-eyed, Roman Catholic white woman and a black man from Nigeria, she was placed in foster care and shortly thereafter adopted by a white couple and raised Jewish.
After college, she met Alex Diaz-Asper, a Catholic born in Miami of immigrant parents from Spain and Cuba. At 33, she married him, then settled down in Washington in Adams Morgan, a "multi-culti" neighborhood where folks can find Ghana on a map or, at the very least, a Ghanaian eatery around the corner.
Three years ago, the couple had twins: Alejandro, a brown-eyed, curly haired boy, caramel-colored from head to toe -- "People say he looks like a kid in a Gap ad: very 'ambi-ethnic.' " -- and Miguel, a tot with straight, blonde hair, ice-blue eyes, and the ruddy cheeks of a windburned Irishman.
Their mama, who is brown-skinned and curly haired herself, couldn't be prouder. And yet, when she and the boys are at the playground or the grocery store, she still draws puzzled looks, curious stares and the questions ...
"Are you the nanny?"
"Is Miguel adopted?"
"What are you?"
Even today, at a time when immigration and changing social attitudes are helping to swell the numbers of multiracial Americans at 10 times the rate of white population growth, multiethnic people are still struggling to avoid being labeled and marginalized by a society they say is far from entering a "post-race" era.
Clearly, the presidential candidacy of Barack Obama, son of a black man and a white woman, has revived a national conversation on racial attitudes. Likewise, it has drawn new attention to the unique perspectives and experiences of the roughly 5 million multi-ethnic people living in America.
Acceptance varies
Ask multiracial Americans whether things are changing, and you're likely to hear there's more outward acceptance now than in decades past for biracial couples, adopted children who don't share the ethnicity of either parent, and so-called "nonmixed" members of multiracial families.
Still, activists who campaign to raise understanding of multiracial people say that acceptance is uneven, varying widely across regions, social classes and generations.
"Appearance is still how people judge you, categorize you," says Heather Tarleton, 28, a biology professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and president of the Interracial Family Circle, a support group founded by her mother, who is black, and her father, who is white.
"You spend most of your life trying to explain to people 'what you are.' And then, once they know what you are, you still are identified with the race you look most like ... So, it's never so much that you're one complete individual with multiple sides, but a fraction of a person that society selects."
That leads multiracial people to ask some questions of their own.
* Is it possible, they wonder, that this nation -- its history steeped in slavery, terrorism by groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, and illicit eroticism between black and white -- is ready to embrace not just white or black, but shades of brown?
* Why is it, they ask, that multiracial people, from the time they leave the stroller to time they go to their graves, are verbally poked and prodded to choose their "primary" ethnicity -- lest it be chosen for them by their peers, based on a glance?
* How is it that even today, when a highway patrol trooper spots a motorist with European and African heritage he sees a black man, not a white one?
* At a more basic level, why are terms such as "race" and "mixed" -- leftovers, sociologists say, from the misguided "racial science" of the 19th century -- still widely used to describe genetic, cultural and social variations within our one human race?
* Why are concepts such as the "one-drop rule" -- the arbitrary, Jim Crow classification of anyone with any African heritage as black -- still accepted by many blacks and whites, even as they serve to deepen divisions?
ID'd by looks alone
It has not gone unnoticed among America's multi-ethnic population that the mainstream media -- indeed, a broad swath of Americans -- tend to refer to Obama as the first serious black contender for the White House.
Jennifer Noble, 31, a psychology professor at Pasadena College (and the daughter of a Sri Lankan woman and an African-American father), says some may use this to pigeonhole him as JUST black: "Whatever you look like to us, that's how we're going to treat you."
Obama himself has said, "I self-identify as African-American -- that's how I'm treated and that's how I'm viewed. I'm proud of it."
Multi-ethnic Americans wrestle with terms that others casually use to categorize them. They wonder whether "mixed" may have a negative, rather than neutral meaning to some people (as in, "mixed up"). Is the term "African-American" appropriate for black immigrants from, say, Haiti?
Megan Hughes, 32, is a white woman who is raising a biracial daughter with her black husband in Washington. "We are still searching for a term that identifies our relationship and our family," she said. " 'Blended' works for me, but my husband thinks that sounds like a smoothie."
Michael Cooley, 17, a high-school senior in Raleigh, has a white mother and a black father. At Wakefield High School, he has a group of black buddies and a group of white buddies.
They don't mingle much, he said.
"I'm the only intermixer. I'd say it's like balancing time between them. Because if I hang out with one of them, well, my black friends will say, 'I guess you got to hang out with your white friends tonight, don't you?' "
Posted: Mon 23 Jun 2008 15:37 Post subject: inaccurate article
* Is it possible, they wonder, that this nation -- its history steeped in slavery, terrorism by groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, and illicit eroticism between black and white -- is ready to embrace not just white or black, but shades of brown?
The nation already does. They are called Hispanics, Arabs, Armenians, Indians, Asians, etc. Now Anglos and Creoles should enjoy the same acceptance
* Why is it, they ask, that multiracial people, from the time they leave the stroller to time they go to their graves, are verbally poked and prodded to choose their "primary" ethnicity -- lest it be chosen for them by their peers, based on a glance?
The Mulitracial Movement has tried to fight that, but black and liberal elites are our primary foes.
* How is it that even today, when a highway patrol trooper spots a motorist with European and African heritage he sees a black man, not a white one?
The question doesn't make any sense. If the cop sees Lenny Kravitz, he sees a "black" guy and if he sees Charles Michael Byrd, he sees a "white" guy. He might also mistake a South Asian or Arab for a "black" person.
* At a more basic level, why are terms such as "race" and "mixed" -- leftovers, sociologists say, from the misguided "racial science" of the 19th century -- still widely used to describe genetic, cultural and social variations within our one human race?
Hell, why are "white" and "black" still used?
* Why are concepts such as the "one-drop rule" -- the arbitrary, Jim Crow classification of anyone with any African heritage as black -- still accepted by many blacks and whites, even as they serve to deepen divisions?
ID'd by looks alone
Because black elites use all their power to promote the "one drop rule" and their liberal allies will support them because it doesn't require any sacrifice on their part.
'
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in
