Click here for essays.
thumb238.jpg  thumb221.jpg  thumb245.jpg  thumb276.jpg  thumb252.jpg  thumb023.jpg  thumb269.jpg  thumb290.jpg  thumb283.jpg  thumb337.jpg  thumb320.jpg  thumb313.jpg  thumb368.jpg  thumb375.jpg  thumb351.jpg  thumb382.jpg  thumb306.jpg


9780939479238.jpg

The Notion of Invisible Blackness

Legal History of the Color Line
by Frank W Sweet

Paperback, 542 pages, ISBN 9780939479238, 36.95

The Rise and Triumph of the One-Drop Rule


Search the full text of this book

Every Year, 35,000 Black-Born Youngsters Redefine Themselves as White

About 1/3 of “White” Americans have detectable African DNA

Genealogists were the first to learn that America’s color line leaks. Black researchers often find White ancestry. White genealogists routinely uncover Black ancestry. Molecular anthropologists now confirm Afro-European mixing in our DNA. The plain fact is that few Americans can truly say that they are genetically unmixed. Yet liberals and conservatives alike agree that so-called Whites and Blacks are distinct political “races.” When did ideology triumph over reality? How did America paint itself into such a strange corner?

Americans changed their concept of “race” many times. Eston Hemings, Jefferson’s son, was socially accepted as a White Virginian because he looked European. Biracial planters in antebellum South Carolina assimilated into White society because they were rich. Intermarried couples were acquitted despite the laws because some courts ruled that anyone one with less than one-fourth African ancestry was White, while others ruled that Italians were Colored. Dozens of nineteenth-century American families struggled to come to grips with notions of “racial” identity as the color line shifted and hardened into its present form.

This 542-page book tells their stories in the light of genetic admixture studies and in the records of every appealed court case since 1780 that decided which side of the color line someone was on. Its index lists dozens of 19th-century surnames. It shows that: The color line was invented in 1691 to prevent servile insurrection. The one-drop rule was invented in the North during the Nat Turner panic. It was resisted by Louisiana Creoles, Florida Hispanics, and the maroon (triracial) communities of the Southeast. It triumphed during Jim Crow as a means of keeping Whites in line by banishing to Blackness any White family who dared to establish friendly relations with a Black family. This analysis of the nearly 300 appealed court cases that determined Americans’ “racial” identity may be the most thorough study of the legal history of the U.S. color line yet published.

Frank W. Sweet was accepted to Ph.D. candidacy in history with a minor in molecular anthropology at the University of Florida in 2003 and has completed all but his dissertation defense. He earned an M.A. in History from American Military University in 2001. He is also the author of several state park historical booklets and published historical essays. He was a member of the editorial board of the magazine Interracial Voice, is a regular lecturer and panelist at historical and genealogical conferences, and manages an online discussion group on the history of U.S. racialism sponsored by Backintyme Publishing. To send email, click here.


Links to buy the book. Compare for best price.

nook.jpg kindle.jpg abs.gif
barnesandnoble.jpg bam.jpg powells.jpg
amazon.jpg textbooksrus.jpg bookdepos.jpg
biblio.jpg abe.jpg alibris.jpg

You can also order this book in person at any major bookstore. This title is distributed by Ingram Book Company.


Find this book in a library near you.


Backintyme Publishing
30 Medford Drive
Palm Coast FL 32137-2504
tel: 860-468-9631
fax: 206-202-4117
email:
sales@backintyme.com

Return to the Backintyme Publishing page (History of the U.S. Color Line).
Return to the Backintyme Performances page (Living History Songs and Stories).
Visit The Study of Racialism, a discussion group on the history of U.S. racialism (the “race” notion) sponsored by Backintyme Publishing.